Jim @ imason - All Comments

re: Automated Publishing of InfoPath Forms (Part 2 of 2)

uuzxjy — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:55:30 GMT

KqUr6V <a href="uxphvcyvinha.com/.../a>, [url=http://bmuutarvawev.com/]bmuutarvawev[/url], [link=http://fctemftqouxg.com/]fctemftqouxg[/link], http://uuuspukcxxwf.com/

re: Isolated Storage in Silverlight 2 Beta 2

Jim Schwartz — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:33:14 GMT

Thanks Todd; I had originally written that code when we were still in Beta 1. The call to the Save method is redundant as it works fine without it (Will update the blog to reflect this)

That is a downer that ApplicationSettings are scoped per browser, but thankfully I haven't had to worry about that yet; the Silverlight apps I've built are using a browser plugin controlled by a custom desktop app, so it will always be the same browser. Thanks for pointing that out though; it's definitely something to keep in mind when designing a Silverlight app.

re: Isolated Storage in Silverlight 2 Beta 2

Todd — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:44:38 GMT

Is ApplicationSettings.Save() necessary? I thought that was supposed to be a Beta 1 requirement that would go away in Beta 2. In my simple tests, I also find that values seem to persist without calling Save directly.

One other note- ApplicationSettings seems to be scoped per browser (same goes for SiteSettings). Values saved this way won't be accessible across browsers on the same PC. We still much use the less convenient UserStore for cross browser storage.

-Todd

Automated Publishing of InfoPath Forms (Part 2 of 2)

Jim @ imason — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:32:19 GMT

We’ve now surpassed 50 InfoPath forms on the InfoPath 2007 / SharePoint 2007 project I’m